Posted by: Gabe Hilado in ASP.NET,SharePoint on June 20th, 2010

I am in the process of getting up to speed with the new Visual Studio 2010 IDE and how it can be used to develop custom SharePoint 2010 solutions.

It’s so easy to do a “Hello World” Web part project now. These days, my Hello World projects typically involve opening up a database table and displaying records in a table. I was able to do this with minimal coding and got it up and running—a full blown Web part—in under 15 minutes!

I created a sample project that opens up the AdventureWorks database and displays employee records in a table:

Sample Visual Web Part Project using Adventure Works Database

Sample Visual Web Part Project using Adventure Works Database

The Web-part looks like the following when used inside SharePoint:

AdventureWorks Employees Web Part

AdventureWorks Employees Web Part So far, I like it!Here are my first impressions:SharePoint project templates come out-of-the-box install of VS 2010. After installing VS 2010, the SharePoint project templates are ready for use. No need to do installations of VS-extensions.SharePoint Project Templates in Visual Studio 2010


  • The Visual Web Part project cannot be deployed as a “sandboxed solution”. It has to be deployed as a farm solution.
  • Project-debugging became a lot easier even with a full-blow farm-deployment. Press F5 in the VS 2010 IDE and Visual Studio will build, package, deploy, and activate your feature, and launch the debug-browser all in one click! When you’re done debugging, terminate Internet Explorer, Visual Studio will deactivate and retract the solution out of SharePoint.
  • IIS-reset (for the target Web app) even for full-blown deployments when debugging is fast!
  • Remember in VSeWSS 1.3 where you had to Google first how to specify the group the Web part appears in because it wasn’t so obvious? Well, it got easier in VS 2010! Now, the Elements.xml file has a place-holder for the Web-part group. All you have to do, is change it from “Custom” to whatever value you want it to be. It’s so visible now you can’t miss it.

Web-Part Group Place-Holder in Elements.xml File

Web-Part Group Place-Holder in Elements.xml File


  • You can now add Web User Controls (ASCX files) into the project! As a matter of fact, the project template adds one ASCX file for you. This just made Web Part development a HECK of a lot easier! This is HUGE! Back in VS 2008 developing SharePoint 2007 Web parts, there were no designers available. If developers wanted to use ASCX files, they had to create regular ASP.NET Web apps, design the ASCX files there, write the code-behind, compile the project so the code-behind logic gets packaged with the ASCX files, deploy the ASCX files to UserControls folder within the SharePoint virtual Web app folder, deploy and enable Smart Part, add a Smart Part Web part to the SharePoint pages, then finally, hook-up the Smart Part to the ASCX files. Whew!!! Talk about LOTS of steps! In VS 2010, you don’t need Smart Part or that lengthy way to integrate ASCX file in SharePoint anymore. The challenge of “imagining” what your Web part will look like as you write your C# code is no more. The designer is built in to the Visual Web Part project. Leverage your ASP.NET skills to the max.
  • Despite all the improvements, Web part development veterans should recognize familiar concepts and project files such as Elements.xml, .webpart file, strong-named key file, packages and features. 

I have many ASP.NET developer friends who didn’t want to get into SharePoint development because:

  • The Web part project wasn’t easy in SharePoint 2007. No designers, hard to design a visual element.
  • ASP.NET developers got accustomed to easy debugging of their projects by simply pressing F5 key or the play button on the IDE toolbar. In 2007, ASP.NET developers thought deploying the app and then attaching to the w3wp.exe process (multiple manual steps, not one) was too cumbersome.
  • It took forever to even debug the code because the SharePoint Web app always recycled on deployments.

If you are an ASP.NET developer contemplating if you should try SharePoint development, I highly recommend you try it NOW! SharePoint 2010 development feels like traditional ASP.NET development more than ever!

Posted by: Gabe Hilado in Career,SharePoint on April 1st, 2010

I was viewing my blog today and noticed the tag cloud on my sidebar. The most prominent tags are “SharePoint”, “Developers”, and “Administrators”. SharePoint. Developers. Administrators.

From time to time, I will meet SharePoint professionals in networking events or when interviewing job applicants at a customer site and I will ask what their SharePoint experience is like. “Oh I am a SharePoint Developer“. Then I find out that the extent of their development experience revolves around master-page and page-layout design, style/CSS customizations, and graphical/logo design. Basically, branding tasks. And then there is the “SharePoint Administrator“. “Oh, I am the site collection administrator and manage user-permissions, site-collection features, and sometimes recycle items for end-users from the Recycling Bin.”

I think people are calling themselves SharePoint Developer more than they should. In my opinion, a SharePoint developer is someone who can develop Web parts, workflows, user-controls, Web controls, ASPX pages, client-side scripting, and complete SharePoint solutions. In addition, they also understand deployment options such as creating solution packages. If your experience around SharePoint is limited to CSS, branding, and design stuff, you’re a designer, buddy; not a developer, but a designer.

Now, let’s talk about the “SharePoint Administrator”. Yes, to a point, the site-collection administrator is an administrator. But to me, and again, this is just my opinion, farm admins are the real SharePoint administrators. To call yourself a SharePoint administrator, especially on job interviews, you better know your SharePoint deployment scenarios, Central Admin, SharePoint disaster/recovery procedures, IIS, SQL Server, Windows Server OS, and the beloved “stsadm” command.

Sometimes I will encounter resumes where the job applicant puts “SharePoint Developer” or “SharePoint Administrator” in their work history but nothing in the roles and responsibilities indicate the degree of technical expertise required to be called a “real SharePoint Developer” or a “real SharePoint Administrator”! 

The point I’m trying to make is please, please, please–do not inflate your work experience, especially when applying for jobs. You might fool the recruiters but you’re not going to fool the technical leads. Please be honest in your resumes because people will catch you if you think the inflated titles will make you a better candidate for a job.

Honesty people!

Posted by: Gabe Hilado in SharePoint,SharePoint Deployment on December 30th, 2009

Using VSeWSS 1.3 with Visual Studio 2008, when you create a new Web Part project, you can edit the Web part properties and descriptions using the WSP View. The typical Solution Explorer in VS 2008 looks like the following when working on a Web part project:

Solution Explorer in VS 2008

Solution Explorer in VS 2008

In order to see the manifest.xml or feature.xml file, you have to look at the “WSP View“. WSP View can be accessed by going to the menu and hitting View–>Other Windows–>WSP View. The WSP View looks like the following:

WSP View

WSP View

The manifest.xml file doesn’t contain “product description” type information. The manifest.xml contains assemblies and features information. The feature.xml file, that on the other hand, start containing “description” type data. Here’s what the feature.xml contents typically look like:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<Feature Id="cfc5cfdd-62cf-4d98-aeba-e1b38ec6f64f"


             Description="A Web part that wants to say hello to you."

             Scope="Site" Version="" Hidden="FALSE"

             DefaultResourceFile="core" xmlns="">


    <ElementManifest Location="HelloPart\HelloPart.xml" />

    <ElementFile Location="HelloPart\HelloPart.webpart" />



See that Title and Description attributes inside the Feature element? They will get displayed in the Site Features Gallery: 

WP Title and Description in the Features Gallery

WP Title and Description in the Features Gallery

What about the Web part file (in the example I’m using above, the filename is HelloPart.webpart)? What information can be customized and modified here? First, let’s take a look at the contents of the webpart file:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>


  <webPart xmlns="">



      The following Guid is used as a reference to the web part class,

      and it will be automatically replaced with actual type name at deployment time.


      <type name="247ef4d4-489d-46d1-a628-8d8daa6267a3" />

      <importErrorMessage>Cannot import HelloPart Web Part.</importErrorMessage>




        <property name="Title" type="string">Gabe's Hello Web Part</property>

        <property name="Description" type="string">HelloPart is a user-friendly Web part....</property>





Inside webPart–>data–>properties section, there are property elements. The first one is the “Title” and the other is the “Description“. The values for “Title” and “Description” contained in the webpart file are what gets displayed in the Web part catalog:


WP Title and Desription in the WP Catalog

WP Title and Desription in the WP Catalog

Finally, let’s take a look at the Web part XML file (in the example I used above, the filename is HelloPart.xml). The Web part XML file contains the following:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<Elements Id="247ef4d4-489d-46d1-a628-8d8daa6267a3" xmlns="" >

  <Module Name="WebParts" List="113" Url="_catalogs/wp">

    <File Path="HelloPart.webpart" Url="HelloPart.webpart" Type="GhostableInLibrary" />



See how the File element doesn’t have any children? We can put a Property element as a child of the File element. This Property element will contain the “Group” the Web part appears in the catalog. By default, like the in the Web part XML file example above, the Group is not specified and therefore, the Web part gets listed under Miscellaneous Group in the Web Part catalog. If you want the Web part to appear in a group other than Miscellaneous, transform the Web part XML file from the above example to the following:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<Elements Id="247ef4d4-489d-46d1-a628-8d8daa6267a3" xmlns="" >

  <Module Name="WebParts" List="113" Url="_catalogs/wp">

        <File Path="HelloPart.webpart" Url="HelloPart.webpart" Type="GhostableInLibrary">

              <Property Name="Group" Value="My Stuff"/>




We added the Property element below the File element. The Name attribute of the Property element should have a value of “Group” and the Value attribute is the group name you want the Web part to appear in the catalog. In the example above, after the Web part gets deployed, the Web part appears in a category called “My Stuff“:

Web Part appearing on specified Group

Web Part appearing on specified Group